Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id CAA29638; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 02:32:34 -0800 Received: from skiddaw.elsevier.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id CAA29633; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 02:32:31 -0800 Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by skiddaw.elsevier.co.uk (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA15157 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:30:32 +0100 Received: from tees by snowdon with SMTP (PP); Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:24:08 +0100 Received: (from dpr@localhost) by tees (SMI-8.6/8.6.12) id LAA03350 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:30:54 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199604041030.LAA03350@tees> Subject: Re: released To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:30:54 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <199604031809.KAA27616@atropos.c2.org> from "sameer@c2.org" at Apr 3, 96 10:09:29 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Status: O X-Status: In reply to sameer@c2.org who said > > I sent to a number of press contacts that I have. Should I > post to newsgroups? Which ones are appropriate? I was quite happy with that last release but I'm not so happy about the decision to send it out. You posted the last draft at about 9 your time, there was a single +1 from Rob Hartill and then you sent it out. This is a worldwide group, there should be at least 24 hours allowed for everyone involved to make their comments before things actually happen. Not a problem this time but something to take note of. -- Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd. (Netcraft Ltd. contractor) Elsevier Science TIS online journal project. Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155