Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id MAA08571; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:39:15 -0800 Received: from skiddaw.elsevier.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id MAA08554; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:39:07 -0800 Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by skiddaw.elsevier.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA05953 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:36:55 GMT Received: from tees by snowdon with SMTP (PP); Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:33:08 +0000 Received: (from dpr@localhost) by tees (SMI-8.6/8.6.12) id UAA27549 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:37:16 GMT Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:37:16 GMT From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199603132037.UAA27549@tees> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: CVS Read-Only Solution Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-MD5: CUfYDXR8aWwg7BWO1WAQug== Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Status: O X-Status: > I don't think the ftp snapshot idea is as useful. I watch the cvs commit > messages on the mailing list and I often see something which may or may > not affect my module development. I'd like to be able to request individual > patches. Trying to hunt down changes from an ftp snapshot based on the > rather sparse info sent to the commit mailing list would be a nightmare. ok, so the problem is that non-core developers want acces to cvs, a reasonable request and that Brian doesn't want to give accounts to anyone who just wants to look at Apache sources. The solution is just to make the cvs repository available using other means. I'll look at this *NOW* and let people know about things in a bit.