Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id TAA16259; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 19:15:23 -0800 Received: from luers.qosina.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA16252; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 19:15:20 -0800 Received: (from awm@localhost) by luers.qosina.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) id WAA23549 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 22:15:04 -0500 From: Aram Mirzadeh Message-Id: <199603020315.WAA23549@luers.qosina.com> Subject: Re: 1.1b0+ak on Solaris 2.5 To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 22:15:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: from "rasmus@madhaus.utcs.utoronto.ca" at Mar 1, 96 07:01:32 pm Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Status: O X-Status: > > I ran 1.1b0+ak on a Solaris 2.5 box with 96 Megs of memory for about > 24 hours. With 9 active clients it drove the load to up over 20. > When I switched back to 1.0.2_patched it handled those same 9 client > connections with a load average of under 0.5. Anybody else seen this? I thought it was me, I have the same thinking running on a linux p100 w/20mb of ram, only a ppp connection to the web, and 2 people accessing it, mine killed my cpu. My load was up to 90 by the time I killed it off. I've not put it backup since. I was playing around with kernel upgrades since then. BTW, anyone else running linux, if you're running 1.3.5x or higher see if apache stays up. I have received 4-5 bug reports saying that they had to downgrade back to the stable kernels for it to stay up. -- Aram Mirzadeh awm@qosina.com,awm@hyperreal.com http://www.qosina.com/~awm/ 43rd Law of Computing: Anything that can go wr Segmentation violation -- Core dumped