Message-Id: <m0tlwmo-0000kLC@mamba.ast.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 96 11:51 GMT
From: drtr@ast.cam.ac.uk (David Robinson)
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: enough
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

>  100b.os2_port.patch    09-Feb-96 15:26    26K

-1: Don't run OS/2, don't plan to. But more important than that,
    it doesn't patch cleany, either, but maybe I missed something. I tried
    both before and after the rest of them.

Why don't you supply details of how it failed?

>>  23a.mmap.patch         07-Feb-96 10:19     4K
>
>-1: Not quite. Patches and compiles fun, but...:
>
>map: Operation not supported
>httpd: Could not mmap memory
>
>And then it dies (HP/UX 9.04)
>I don't like my HTTP server to just not run.

Really?
It worked for RobH; how do your systems differ?

I think the error must have been
'mmap:...' rather than
'map:...'

Can you send me the man page for mmap?

>>  97.proxy-02.tar.gz     09-Feb-96 07:53    34K
>
>-1: Doesn't link on my system:
>
>/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols:
>   utimes (code)
>
>Otherwise, looks great. And I'm not too bitter about the "None of 
>Alexei's code is left" comment, either.

Sigh. I started off using utime() and then switched to utimes() because
I thought it would be more portable.

Can I call for a straw poll on this list? Does your system have utime()
and does it have utimes()?

>>  99.bind.patch          09-Feb-96 11:17    11K
>
>-1: Sorry, but after all the other patches, this one fails. Time for a
>    rewrite?

I think this veto is out of order; just because you didn't test the
patch, it does mean that you have to veto it.

In fact, the patch should apply cleanly against the 1.0.2 distribution,
so you _can_ test it if you want to.

 David.