Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id UAA06977; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 20:47:05 -0800 Received: from mail.barrnet.net by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id UAA06971; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 20:47:02 -0800 Received: from ace.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us (ace.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us [198.31.42.1]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.7.3/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id UAA14486 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 20:47:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by ace.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA206680415; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 20:46:55 -0800 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 20:46:54 -0800 (PST) From: Alexei Kosut To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: 97.proxy-02.tar.gz In-Reply-To: <9602111823.aa13411@paris.ics.uci.edu> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com On Sun, 11 Feb 1996, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Ummm, rather than introducing a patch for a patch, how about just > creating a 97a? The dependencies between patches in the current > round are already too confusing. Mainly because it's not a patch, but a tarfile with lots of stuff in it. It's less confusing to patch it then to redo it (and probably screw something else up in the meanwhile). --/ Alexei Kosut /--------/ Lefler on IRC ----------------------------/ The viewpoints expressed above are entirely false, and in no way represent Alexei Kosut nor any other person or entity. /--------------