Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id KAA13924; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 10:54:50 -0800 Received: from shado.jaguNET.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id KAA13904; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 10:54:42 -0800 Received: (from jim@localhost) by shado.jaguNET.com (8.7.3/jmj-2.0) id NAA20857 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:54:38 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199602191854.NAA20857@shado.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: SysV Shared Memory Patch To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:54:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199602191747.MAA19500@shado.jaguNET.com> from "Jim Jagielski" at Feb 19, 96 12:47:47 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com I muttered : > > I've completed the 2nd (and latest) version of my SysV-Shared-Memory > patches for Apache 1.1b0. 3rd version now uploaded... Hrmmm > Right now, the patches do these things: > > 3. The segment is deleted when Apache would unlink the scoreboard > file, thus preventing filling up kernel slots (we can't have > the main Apache process call shmctl() to delete the segment > right after it's attached in this case, because it prevents > forked children from attaching the segments [since kids don't > inherit segments and require their own shmat() call]) As noted, this isn't true... The latest patch is now cleaner thanks to the above :) -- Jim Jagielski << jim@jaguNET.com >> | "That's a Smith & Wesson, ** jaguNET Access Services ** | and you've had your six" Email: info@jaguNET.com | - James Bond ++ http://www.jaguNET.com/ +++ Voice/Fax: 410-931-7060 ++