Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id QAA27397; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 16:08:33 -0800 Received: from infinity.c2.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA27392; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 16:08:30 -0800 Received: (from sameer@localhost) by infinity.c2.org (8.7.1/8.6.9) id QAA07851 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 16:02:51 -0800 (PST) Community ConneXion: Privacy & Community: From: sameer Message-Id: <199602020002.QAA07851@infinity.c2.org> Subject: Re: the next release To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 16:02:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <199602012323.AA126307010@ooo.lanl.gov> from "Rob Hartill" at Feb 1, 96 04:23:30 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com No, rlimit_warning.patch I think it is in for_Apache_1.0.2, already. > > > > > My rlimitpatch might want to go into 1.0.3 as well. Not a > > showstopper, yes, but those warnings are very disconcerting. > > incoming/mod_rlimit.c ? > > You want it moved into for_Apache_1.0.2/ ? > > > -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3 Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734 The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376 http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org