httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@ast.cam.ac.uk (David Robinson)
Subject Re: SysV Shared Memory Patch (v108b)
Date Wed, 21 Feb 1996 13:28:00 GMT
>Will the fact that we shmctl(...IPC_RMID...) the segment right after we
>attach it cause other non-forked processes to not be able to access the
>segment (i.e. Will the kernel refuse to honor any future shmat() calls
>for that segment since it's "trashed-but-kept-active"?

Experiment shows that this is the case.

 David.

Mime
View raw message