httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aram Mirzadeh <...@qosina.com>
Subject Re: Votes, and 1.0.3?
Date Fri, 16 Feb 1996 04:15:31 GMT
> 
> To be honest, folks, I agree - this patch round has a lot of 
> functionality enhancements *and* bugfixes, so I propose we build
> 
> 1) 1.0.3 with the bugfixes (61, 62, 66, 68, 70, 74/75, 77, 82, 85-89, 92, 
> 96, 98, 101, 103, and I'd even be willing to put 100 in there as well)
> 
> 2) 1.1b0, which has all the others, plus the new modules.  

I don't see the point of building both.  As far as testing test patches in
general public if you have one that holds everything, then they'll test 
everything.  Having two releases will just lead to more confusion than it's
worth. I really don't care what we call it, 1.0.3, or 1.1b0, or 1.test.1
( I rather like 2.1b just because it's still beta code, and shouldn't be 
trusted, 1.0.3 does mean it's a good 1.0.0 with 3 patch revisions )  at
least that's how I read it. 

<Aram>
-- 
#define BITCOUNT(x)     (((BX_(x)+(BX_(x)>>4)) & 0x0F0F0F0F) % 255)
#define  BX_(x)         ((x) - (((x)>>1)&0x77777777)                    \
                             - (((x)>>2)&0x33333333)                    \
                             - (((x)>>3)&0x11111111))

                -- really weird C code to count the number of bits in a word
Aram Mirzadeh					http://www.qosina.com/~awm/
awm@qosina.com					awm@hyperreal.com

Mime
View raw message