httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Hartill <hart...@ooo.lanl.gov>
Subject Re: patch - vote
Date Sun, 11 Feb 1996 16:20:01 GMT
 
> > Com'on Roy. Producing a valid patch for an OS I don't have access to
> > is unreasonable. The errors Aram reports are a Linux issue that is
> > probably easily fixed once someone finds where Linux decided to put
> > it.
> 
> Yes it is unreasonable, if you had no help from the rest of the group.  But
> that's the point of the vote system isn't it?  I didn't release the patch
> so I can't go start changing stuff around adding lines to it and releasing
> it again... that's the authors job.

If you know how to fix the problem, the author will be more than
happy to let you upload a replacement patch. If the author doesn't
like the new patch, it can be vetoed.

I can only assume that by your above statement you're affraid to
step on someone else's toes^H^H^H^Hpatch... don't be.

rob

Mime
View raw message