httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Richards <p.richa...@elsevier.co.uk>
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: socket error on APACHE v1.0]
Date Fri, 09 Feb 1996 11:10:49 GMT
> From owner-new-httpd@hyperreal.com  Fri Feb  9 03:30:57 1996
> From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: socket error on APACHE v1.0]
> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 96 20:27:40 MST
> X-Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory
> X-Snail: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663, Los Alamos NM 
87545
> X-Marks-The-Spot: Doh !
> X-Url: http://nqcd.lanl.gov/~hartill/
> X-Cessive-Use-Of-Headers: check
> Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
> 
> 
> > > This could very likely be caused by the sending of SIGHUP once per day.
> > 
> > No, it doesn't.  Apache just has this problem.  And we're not addressing it
> > why I don't know. 
> 
> We can't address what we can't see. Some of us simply don't get these
> problems. They seem to be platform dependent, with linux being the
> biggest sufferer. An earlier user explanation I forwarded seemed to
> blame slow OS responses to a lost connection that had just been
> negotiated and was awaiting a process to accept it.

Is anyone seeing this on anything besides Linux? Just one other report
would be enough to make it an Apache problem but so far all I've seen are
Linux reports and that does tend to suggest it's a Linux related thing, even
if Apache is somehow a cuplrit in triggering the problem.

Mime
View raw message