Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id KAA19217; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 10:57:48 -0800 Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id KAA19175; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 10:57:42 -0800 Received: (from randy@localhost) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) id MAA11965 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 12:57:33 -0600 From: Randy Terbush Message-Id: <199601181857.MAA11965@sierra.zyzzyva.com> Subject: Re: dbm -> db To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 12:57:33 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <199601181823.AA131219386@ooo.lanl.gov> from "Rob Hartill" at Jan 18, 96 11:23:06 am MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 449 Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > > > > I looked into this a little more. Appears that NetBSD and BSDI > > have mapped the older dbm routines into db. I can't comment on > > FreeBSD, but I am sure that one of you Free chaps can. :-) > > > > What OS ware you and Andy(Cohen) working on? > > HPsUX and irix (i think) > Hmm. 10.0? (HP) All of my 9.0 machines have dbm. If this is 10.0, drop me some private mail. I'd be interested in your impressions. I've been dreading it.