Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 14:46:45 -0500
Message-Id: <199601151946.OAA00473@luers.qosina.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
From: "Aram W. Mirzadeh" <awm@qosina.com>
Subject: Re: mod_imap update? 
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

At 08:44 AM 1/15/96 -0600, you wrote:
>> 
>> This makes sense....  should I make a patch and put it in for a vote on the 
>> next release?
>> 
>> >From: djk@chbi.co.uk
>> >Subject: WWW Form Bug Report: "mod_imap.c doesn't tell WHY it returns
>> SERVER_ERROR" on Linux
>
>Please don't. mod_imap_new is broken.
>
>The author of mod_imap has also offered a greatly improved version of
>mod_imap that should be considered. There does however seem to be some
>similar problems with relative URLs that I have not had time to sort out.
>
>There is also a very large mod_imap patch in the queue that will undoubtedly
>create conflicts for any further change.
>

Some what off topic, but talking about patch conflicts... is cvs in place now?

<Aram>
--
Aram W. Mirzadeh, MIS Manager, Qosina Corporation
http://www.qosina.com/~awm/, awm@qosina.com
Apache httpd server team http://www.apache.org