httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aram W. Mirzadeh" <...@qosina.com>
Subject Re: binaries
Date Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:00:11 GMT
At 08:45 PM 1/30/96 -0800, you wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Jan 1996, Rob Hartill wrote:
>
>> I'm creating a binary for HPUX as follows..
>> 
>> #Module auth_module         mod_auth.o
>> Module dbm_auth_module  mod_auth_dbm.o
>
>Uh... why not auth_module? auth and dbm_auth coexist perfectly peacfully. 
>In fact, they like living together. Not putting in auth_module means you
>break billions of installed sites. (okay, so I'm exaggerating.) Am I
>wrong? I know we've had this discussion before. 

I've been doing it the other way... no dbm, but with mod_auth since 99% 
of linux systems don't have dbm installed.

Do we have a standard set of modules ( other the usuall ) that we're 
supposed to include in our binaries?
>
>--/ Alexei Kosut <akosut@nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us> /--------/ Lefler on IRC
>----------------------------/ <http://www.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us/~akosut/>
>The viewpoints expressed above are entirely false, and in no way
>represent Alexei Kosut nor any other person or entity. /--------------
>
>
--
Aram W. Mirzadeh, MIS Manager, Qosina Corporation
http://www.qosina.com/~awm/, awm@qosina.com
Apache httpd server team http://www.apache.org



Mime
View raw message