From: Chuck Murcko <chuck@telebase.com>
Message-Id: <199512281824.NAA09562@telebase.com.>
Subject: Re: (fwd) Apache 1.0, UnixWare and Orphans
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 1995 13:24:00 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Ack sent. This is different from (and in addition to) what I reported
earlier, from the sound of it. I wish I had a system I could test/fix
this on. This was forwarded to me from, I think, the comp.os.unixware
newsgroup.

Peter Baker liltingly intones:
> 
> I am running UnixWare 2.0 and Apache 1.0.  
> 
> > I had just compiled the latest version and everything seemed great!  
> > 
> > Then I noticed that some of my Virtual sites were not responding.  So I 
> > tried to stop the server but it would not.  It looked like the parent 
> > process was killed but the child proccess were left running.
> > 
> > I tried everything I know (that is kill -9 PID) and nothing worked.  So I 
> > had to restart and use the old server 8.14.  
> > 
> > The only thing out of the ordinary I have done is compiled with the -Ki486 
> > command.  This was done on all other versions and did not seem to cause 
> > any problems.  
> > 
> > The other thing I did notice is when the Parent process was running, a new 
> > connection would cause a new child.  The connection at the other end would 
> > have send the request, but would never get a response.
> > 
> > The virtual hosts are running as loop back addresses.
> > 
> > 
> > Any one have any ideas on this one??
> > 
> > =-Peter Baker-=
> > 
> 
> 
chuck
Chuck Murcko	Telebase Systems, Inc.	Wayne PA	chuck@telebase.com
And now, on a lighter note:
Be a better psychiatrist and the world will beat a psychopath to your
door.