Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id VAA02549; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 21:51:48 -0800 Received: from infinity.c2.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id VAA02516; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 21:51:05 -0800 Received: (from sameer@localhost) by infinity.c2.org (8.7.1/8.6.9) id VAA12237 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 21:45:07 -0800 (PST) Community ConneXion: Privacy & Community: From: sameer Message-Id: <199512120545.VAA12237@infinity.c2.org> Subject: Re: opinions on DoSetEUID To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 21:44:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <199512120538.XAA07363@sierra.zyzzyva.com> from "Randy Terbush" at Dec 11, 95 11:38:55 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I am pretty concerned with the security of it, as well. My biggest fear is the switching back to euid nobody after processing a request under someone else's uid. I haven't closely looked at the code though, and was hoping someone else has gone through it closely. > > > Have people installed DoSetEUID? Has it worked? My mod_ecash > > would be much easier with DoSetEUID, but I'm curious to know if > > it actually works well. > > > > -- > > I have done some limited testing of it, and it seems to work. > There are some real concerns that RST raises about security, and > I got spooked on my main server when I started getting mail > from root generated by the server... I'm still looking at how > to make this as useful as it could be. Comments welcome on the > security issue. > > > -- sameer Voice: 510-601-9777 Community ConneXion FAX: 510-601-9734 The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376 http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org