Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id IAA14191; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 08:20:22 -0800 Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA14182; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 08:20:18 -0800 Received: (from randy@localhost) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) id KAA05012 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 10:20:15 -0600 From: Randy Terbush Message-Id: <199512071620.KAA05012@sierra.zyzzyva.com> Subject: Re: New feature: TGI? To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 10:20:15 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <199512071547.HAA14857@eitech.eit.com> from "Geoff White" at Dec 7, 95 07:47:10 am Content-Type: text Content-Length: 977 Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org > > At 09:16 PM 12/6/95 -0600, new-httpd@hyperreal.com wrote: > >> > >> Benefits as I see then: (this is open to interpertaion ;-) > >> - Speed. > >> - Allows for complex applications. > >> - Any where you can put a URL (href, img, get, post, etc.) > >> a TGI deamon can be called to do something. > >> - TGI deamons can be started and stoped as needed > >> without stoping the server. > >> - Rights to access TGI URLs are still controlled by the > >> server's standard access control (access.conf, .htaccess, etc.). > >> > > > >These features are all available in the module API that Robert Thau > >provided us in Apache. > > Um not quite, from what I understand this also allows you to create > portable modules, if I implement TGI for Netsite [ack!] then the modules > would be interchangeable between servers compiled for the same OS/CPU > architecture? If you implement the Apache API on Netsite you could also do this with the Apache modules, no?