httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Schrenk <nschr...@neog.com>
Subject Re: application/x-dvi
Date Fri, 08 Dec 1995 17:44:45 GMT


On Wed, 6 Dec 1995, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> > This is also why the MIME type for server parsed html is
> > text/x-server-parsed-html instead of text/server-parsed-html.
> 
> Yes, but it should have been the latter (or, better yet, server/parsed-html).
> As far as I'm concerned, there is no value in using the "x-" prefix for
> anything.

For the record, I was just describing why things are the way they are, not 
advocating the use of the "x-" prefix anywhere.  It does seem silly to 
end up with "experimental" content types in widespread use.

> ......Roy

Nathan

--
Nathan Schrenk						nschrenk@neog.com
Neoglyphics Media Corp.                              http://www.neog.com/



Mime
View raw message