Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id IAA20624; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 08:01:21 -0800 Received: from cass41 by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id IAA20617; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 08:01:12 -0800 Received: from mamba.ast.cam.ac.uk by cass41 with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #9) id m0tHYdo-000CMVC; Mon, 20 Nov 95 16:00 GMT Received: by mamba.ast.cam.ac.uk (Smail3.1.29.1 #9) id m0tHYdb-0000mpC; Mon, 20 Nov 95 16:00 GMT Message-Id: Date: Mon, 20 Nov 95 16:00 GMT From: drtr@ast.cam.ac.uk (David Robinson) To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: My votes (again). Content-Length: 240 Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org >It caused users of my site to get gratuitously bounced. You may not >consider that a problem. I do, and it justifies the veto. No it does NOT. Look at the patch again. IT REDIRECTS THE USERS TO THE CORRECT URL. IT DOES NOT BOUNCE THEM.