Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id LAA19491; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 11:52:02 -0700 Received: from arachnet.algroup.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA19453; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 11:51:43 -0700 Received: from heap.ben.algroup.co.uk by arachnet.algroup.co.uk id aa27125; 26 Oct 95 19:50 BST Received: from gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk by heap.ben.algroup.co.uk id aa09382; 26 Oct 95 19:49 BST Subject: Re: Apache-SSL license To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 19:14:05 +0100 (BST) From: Ben Laurie In-Reply-To: <9510261714.AA12582@tees.elsevier.co.uk> from "Andrew Wilson" at Oct 26, 95 05:14:18 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1673 Message-ID: <9510261914.aa25786@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk> Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org > > > Here's the license I intend to include in the Apache-SSL patches. This does > > _not_ replace the existing license, it is in addition to it. If anyone has > > any objects/suggestions, please let me know. > > > * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this > > * software must display the following acknowledgment: > > * "This product includes software developed by Ben Laurie > > * for use in the Apache-SSL HTTP server project." > > [snippety] > > Mmm, Apache-SSL? So it *is* an Apache Group project? I'm not sure that > we should set a precedent in allowing non-Apache group projects to bear the > Apache name directly. FreeSSL-HTTP using Apache might be a better designation. > It's just a suggestion, but I think it's important, cuz one day we'll end up > seeing MicrosoftApache v1.0 and then we won't have anyone to complain to suz > we've already let non-Apache Group initiatives [yeah I know it's a grey area ;)] > take our name. > > Just cuz we can't make it a trademark, dun't mean we can't honour it as one. Well, I would hope that in a more enlightened age Apache-SSL could be reintegrated with Apache. I also hope that the Apache Group will give me permission to use the name. I note that the protected name is "Apache Server", which I am not using. Furthermore, if Microsoft want to use Apache why would we want to stop them? > > Whatcha think? > > > Cheers, > > > > Ben. > > Cheers, > Ay. Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435 Freelance Consultant Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472 and Technical Director Email: ben@algroup.co.uk A.L. Digital Ltd, London, England.