Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id QAA29228; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 16:00:42 -0700 Received: from ooo.lanl.gov by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id QAA29220; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 16:00:40 -0700 Received: from localhost.lanl.gov by ooo.lanl.gov with SMTP (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA06961; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:00:13 -0600 Message-Id: <307AFAFD.21A7@lanl.gov> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:00:13 -0600 From: Rob Hartill X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b1 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.07 9000/715) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: Q: Apache 0.8.14 suitable for production? References: <45aqg8$1e4@server-b.cs.interbusiness.it> <45eq2r$3j5@crl.crl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Bad PR... c.i.w.s.u Daniel L. Smith wrote: > > In khera@kciLink.com (Vivek Khera) writes: > > > >>>>> "DM" == Davide Migliavacca writes: > > > DM> To anybody "experienced" with Apache 0.8.x: I am going to replace > > DM> a working site's server software with Apache. Should I use 0.6 or > > DM> is 0.8 stable (in your experience)? > > > I find Apache 0.8.14 to be quite stable. I run a production > > Same here, except for the fact that even 0.8.14 gets confused > about passwords on a per-directory basis, and won't consistently authenticate > known-good passwords. Switching to NCSA 1.4.2 quickly cleared this up. > I'll go back to Apache when I can reliably block off a restricted cgi > directory to authenticated users. > > Daniel > -- > Daniel L Smith Snapper's Mate, Sophia's Dad, Hoopy Frood > dls@crl.com dls@wais.com P.O. 613, Sausalito, CA, 94966