Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id QAA02109; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 16:20:05 -0700 Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA02057; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 16:19:56 -0700 Received: from luers.qosina.com (luers.qosina.com [206.64.187.10]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id MAA08763 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 12:44:32 -0500 Received: from guru.qosina.com (guru.qosina.com [206.64.187.50]) by luers.qosina.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA02416 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 13:34:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 13:34:07 -0400 Message-Id: <199510181734.NAA02416@luers.qosina.com> X-Sender: awm@qosina.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com From: "Aram W. Mirzadeh" Subject: Re: more preparation for 1.0 Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org At 11:39 AM 10/18/95 -0500, you wrote: >> >> We should provide as many 1.0 binaries as possible. >> >> So the question now is, what should be compiled in as standard? > >The kitchen sink. If something is missing, we'll get bug reports. >(kitchen sink meaning every module that is distributed as part of >the Apache source. Without MAXIMUM_DNS defined) And no dld for obvious reasons. I can do Linux, both a.out and ELF versions. I can also get an SCO out now... but I think we have 2 others for SCO already. BTW, are SCO, and SCO Desktop, and OpenDesktop 3 different products? -- Aram W. Mirzadeh, MIS Manager, Qosina Corporation http://www.qosina.com/~awm/, awm@qosina.com Apache httpd server team http://www.apache.org