Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id IAA00785; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:15:37 -0700 Received: from alpha.netcraft.co.uk by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA00773; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:15:29 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by alpha.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.9) id QAA14155 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 16:13:40 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199510031513.QAA14155@alpha.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: Umm... The Contributor's page To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 16:13:40 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <199510031441.KAA07399@shado.jaguNET.com> from "Jim Jagielski" at Oct 3, 95 10:41:53 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1782 Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org In reply to Jim Jagielski who said > > I don't have a big ego... I don't do porting so that my name gets on lists. You must be one of a rare breed of computer hacker then :-) > No matter how I phrase this, it's gonna sound petty and cheap, and I > don't want to sound that way. I guess it for reasons like this that some > people don't like the whole idea of contributor lists in the 1st place. Precisely and not just because things can be incorrectly attributed but because the people who get incorrectly attributed have the embarrassment like yourself of having to get the thing corrected. I've always said a simple list of contributers is enough, particularly for general patch contributers. If it's felt a small group of individuals should stand out then list them separately, something like The following have made significant and/or substancial contributions to the Apache project. ... ... .. The following have contributed to the project. (the rest of us) > Name: Jim Jagielski > Email: jim@jaguNET.com > URL: http://www.jaguNET.com/ > Company: jaguNET Access Services (above URL) > Occupation: ISP and Engineer > Location: Baltimore Maryland, USA > O/S Expertise: A/UX > Contributions: Main contributions have been in the support of > A/UX as an "official" Apache OS. Bug fixes include the weird A/UX > POST bug and preventing core dumps on read timeouts. This level of detail is just silly. Only about 3 people have even bothered filling in the details of what they've done, most submit the minimum number of fields to just be attributed as being involved in some way. -- Paul Richards, Netcraft Ltd. Internet: paul@netcraft.co.uk, http://www.netcraft.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1225 447500 (work)