Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id VAA10577; Wed, 13 Sep 1995 21:26:37 -0700 Received: from fully.organic.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id VAA10572; Wed, 13 Sep 1995 21:26:36 -0700 Received: (from brian@localhost) by fully.organic.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id EAA15980; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 04:08:47 GMT Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 21:08:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Behlendorf To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: Questions about Apache License (fwd) In-Reply-To: <199509131234.NAA02810@server.netcraft.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I think Paul has made some excellent points about the license, and probably has more experience with this than anyone else on the team. He knows where our heads are in terms of how we want this server to be used abd the restrictions we want... if he were to submit a patch on the license I would probably +1 it. This should be resolved before a +1. I fully support keeping a mention to NCSA and Rob McCool in as well. As to the legality of the name "Apache Group" - whatever minimal action can be taken to secure that name, perhaps even trademark it, let's do it. I'll probably be the one paying $50/year to get the domain name anyways, so I'm willing to be one of the "names" on whatever legal documents need to be there - Organic can be a sponsoring organization if need be as well. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/