Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id AAA13877;
 Sat, 16 Sep 1995 00:33:30 -0700
Received: from neon.netscape.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with
 ESMTP id AAA13872; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 00:33:28 -0700
Received: (from robm@localhost) by neon.netscape.com (950215.SGI.8.6.10/8.6.9)
 id AAA00659; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 00:32:55 -0700
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 00:32:55 -0700
From: Rob McCool <robm@netscape.com>
Message-Id: <199509160732.AAA00659@neon.netscape.com>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Associate file types with processors for CGI (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <9509131530.AA29329@ooo.lanl.gov>
References: <9509131517.AA03779@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
	<9509131530.AA29329@ooo.lanl.gov>
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

/*
 * "Re: Suggestion: Associate file types with processors for CGI (fwd)" by Rob 
 *    written Wed, 13 Sep 95 9:30:16 MDT
 * 
 * The sun official said that Netscape had announced Java support for
 * an upcoming Windoze Netscape. There was no mention of unix ports,
 * and I got the impression that nobody was working on a unix java
 * browser (I know about HotJava, but that's limited to Solaris AFAIK
 * *).

Just because it wasn't mentioned doesn't mean it's not happening.

 * It could be that we're heading for a huge "have/have not" split on
 * the web.
 */

The only way that will happen is if Microsoft wins.

--Rob