httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>
Subject Re: http_config.c patch for NEXT
Date Wed, 13 Sep 1995 14:57:26 GMT
> 
> At 09:18 AM 9/13/95 -0500, you wrote:
> >> 
> >> At 09:10 AM 9/13/95 -0500, you wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Did you upload this patch again?  Or do you want me to just edit
> >> >> the patch file?
> >> >> 
> >> >
> >> >You should find 06a on hyperreal.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> Should I consider 06_ withdrawn? Or is 06a an fix for 06_ ?
> >
> >As I understand the new patch naming convention, changed patches
> >should retain the same patch number and increment the alpha ID
> >to indicate the latest version. If that is not the case, I am
> >sure that someone will set me straight... :-)
> 
> Ahhh! Okay... what are we using to give a patch for a patch then?
> a new patch number? 
> 
> For example, 1a, 1b are both patches for 16_0.8.12.  Should I have
> made then 1, and 2?

I believe that is correct. It would probably be less confusing to
the voters to re-roll a patch that replaces previous patches for
the same issue and using the alpha character to identifie it as a
replacement.



Mime
View raw message