httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aram W. Mirzadeh" <...@qosina.com>
Subject vote
Date Tue, 05 Sep 1995 16:07:28 GMT
The following votes are mostly:

1) Patch file is good
2) Compiled nicely.
3) No ill-effects
4) Tested to my best ability
5) httpd loaded fine, with no errors.
*) I didn't look at the code and I would know if there is better way of
        doing it. 


+1              01_lock_fname.0.8.12.patch
+1              02_NeXT_fixes.0.8.12.patch
+0              03_utsname_svr4.0.8.12.patch    ( could not  test ) 
+1              04_util_cleanup.0.8.12.patch
+1              05_nego_cleanup.0.8.12.patch
+1              06_ignore_index.0.8.12.patch
+1              07_interrupt_accept.0.8.12.patch
+0              08b_LynxOS_new_gmtoff.0.8.12.patch ( could not test ) 
+0              08c_LynxOS_new_gmtoff.0.8.12.patch ( could not test )
+0              09_no_bsd_conf.0.8.12.patch
                        (Did not go in nice... otherwise ok.  could not test )
+1              10_dynamic_load.0.8.12.patch
+1              11_imap_point.0.8.12.patch
+1              12_virt_server_name.0.8.12.patch
+1              13_new_icons
+1              14_mod_dir_cosmetics.0.8.12.patch
-1              15_log_config_integer_time.0.8.12.patch
                        caused 3 errors.  See patches posted previously to fix
                        this problem.  If patches are applied, +1.
+1              16_virtual_maxopenfiles.0.8.12.patch

I also uploaded 3 more patches... as rst said, maybe the 04_util_cleanup and
2nd patch that I uploaded should be changed to (char *).  I'm no programmer 
so... you decide. :)

<Aram>
--
Aram W. Mirzadeh, MIS Manager, Qosina Corporation
http://www.qosina.com/~awm/, awm@qosina.com
Apache httpd server team http://www.apache.org



Mime
View raw message