Message-Id: <v02130508ac4d96a3fe66@taltos.med.cornell.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 18:41:45 -0400
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
From: hagberg@mail.med.cornell.edu (Eric Hagberg)
Subject: Re: problem with nested includes?
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

At 11:19 PM 8/8/95, Andrew Wilson wrote:

> Uuuh,  try making BOTH files u+x:
>
>         chmod u+x the_file.html
>         chmod u+x DocumentRoot/lastmod.inc
>
> that's if you're using the -DXBITHACK mods to indicate that the files
> are to be parsed.
>
> The alternative is to add the directive
>
>    XBitHack Full
>
> to the .htaccess governing these pages, or more globally

The above does work...

>    XBitHack Full
>
> in the conf/access.conf

I assume that one would too...

> Then again you could tell the server that .inc files are really like
> .shtml files (I don't use this notation but it's a directive to indicate
> that the server should parse these files) in srm.conf
>
>    AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .shtml

And this _was_ just about what I had done... though previous versions
allowed one to specify:

AddType text/x-server-parsed-html lastmod.inc

But this version requires:

AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .inc

In other words, you can't specify just one specific filename to get parsed
in a directory, it has to be an extension...

> As ever:
>
>    #ifdef ANDY_ISNT_TALKING_CACK
>
> which on current form is very unlikely.

"CACK"? Is there a missing "R" in the sentence and and extra "L"? Just kidding.

Thanks,

-ech

______________________________________________________
Eric Hagberg                       Phone: 212-746-6387
User Services Manager, CUMC/OAC    Fax:   212-746-8161