Return-Path: owner-new-httpd Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id OAA19177; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 14:40:29 -0700 Received: from eat.organic.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id OAA19170; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 14:40:27 -0700 Received: (from brian@localhost) by eat.organic.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA02789; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 14:41:26 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 14:41:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Behlendorf To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: Showstopper bug ? In-Reply-To: <9508082131.AA29381@volterra> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Tue, 8 Aug 1995, Robert S. Thau wrote: > FWIW, Brian, I have already built a candidate 0.8.9 Yup, saw that. With 300 messages/day it's hard to read everything before responding to a single message, but I promise to try harder. > I'm +1 on releasing everything I tossed into that build, but I could > certainly live with not releasing anything new until things settle down > a bit... In the interests of stability, I would recommend waiting until Friday for a few more bug reports (I still need to test the DBM patch you posted). As long as the -DMAXIMAL_DNS bug (and a patch) is put on the known-bugs page those who need it can get it there, so I don't consider it a showstopper. We will get a few more bugs in the next few days, I can feel it :) I'd like to see if we could squish all the items on the "known bugs" list while we're at it, particular the /tmp/htstatus situation. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/