Return-Path: owner-new-httpd
Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id HAA25274;
 Tue, 29 Aug 1995 07:11:47 -0700
Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP
 id HAA25269; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 07:11:44 -0700
Received: from volterra (volterra.ai.mit.edu) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10)
 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA29545; Tue, 29 Aug 95 10:11:42 EDT
From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau)
Received: by volterra (4.1/AI-4.10) id AA13601; Tue, 29 Aug 95 10:11:40 EDT
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 95 10:11:40 EDT
Message-Id: <9508291411.AA13601@volterra>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Cc: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
In-Reply-To: <199508290555.WAA29042@taz.hyperreal.com> (message from Rob
 Hartill on Mon, 28 Aug 1995 22:55:31 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: NEXTSTEP bug fixes (fwd)
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

   From: Rob Hartill <hartill@hyperreal.com>
   Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 22:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
   Precedence: bulk
   Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

   first, I responded to this guy with a thank you.

   If it's not too late, this might count as a showstopper bug that needs
   fixing.

Unfortunately, this *is* past deadline, and it also conflicts with at
least one other current patch (the changes to conf.h conflict with
Randy's no-bsd-conf), which is something I don't have time to resolve
before the vote.

A revised version is a no-brainer for the next round.  I'll even do
the revision.  But if you want an orderly process (and you were one of
two people screaming bloody murder about my doing stuff on a whim),
you have to be prepared to live with it.

rst