httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roy Fielding <field...@beach.w3.org>
Subject Re: NULL in access_log
Date Thu, 17 Aug 1995 17:59:19 GMT
>Florent Guillaume wrote:
>> 
>> > On Thu, 17 Aug 1995, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>> > > 193.131.197.60 - - [17/Aug/1995:10:33:26 +0100] "NULL" 200 864
>> 
>> >[Mark]
>> > ix-atl11-01.ix.netcom.com - - [15/Aug/1995:05:37:44 +0100] "(null)" 200 -
>> > slc100.xmission.com - - [15/Aug/1995:06:45:02 +0100] "(null)" 404 837

Jim replied:
>
>There's no patch needed, since the patch that _creates_ the "NULL"
>string in the log _is_ the patch.

Yes, a patch is required.  All three of the above log entries are
deceptive.  They should not record 200 unless the request was accepted
and a response returned.  Request Timeouts should record 408 (if it
really is a timeout) or 400 (if the request is just invalid).

.......Roy

Mime
View raw message