Return-Path: owner-new-httpd
Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id RAA02947;
 Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:55:37 -0700
Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with
 ESMTP id RAA02886; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:53:57 -0700
Received: from thoth.netgen.com (thoth.netgen.com [204.253.144.130]) by
 sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA00489 for
 <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:53:45 -0500
Received: from bokonon.netgen.com by thoth.netgen.com;
 (5.65/1.1.8.2/25May95-0615PM)
	id AA09327; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:43:32 -0400
Received: by bokonon.Netgen.COM (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA01092; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:42:04 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:42:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Matthew Gray <mkgray@Netgen.COM>
X-Sender: mkgray@bokonon
To: Apache Development List <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>
Subject: Shambhala0.6.0 nph script bug fix
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950710203559.766H-100000@bokonon>
Organization: net.Genesis
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

NPH scripts weren't being properly handled...
A few line patch is at: http://www.netgen.com/~mkgray/apache/mod_cgi.patch

How should patches be handled now?  Has there been any real resolution on 
Apache0.7/Shambhala0.x ???

						...Mkgray