Return-Path: owner-new-httpd
Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) id HAA02051;
 Sat, 8 Jul 1995 07:49:32 -0700
Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP
 id HAA02046; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 07:49:24 -0700
Received: from volterra (volterra.ai.mit.edu) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10)
 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA12068; Sat, 8 Jul 95 10:49:17 EDT
From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau)
Received: by volterra (4.1/AI-4.10) id AA10140; Sat, 8 Jul 95 10:49:15 EDT
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 95 10:49:15 EDT
Message-Id: <9507081449.AA10140@volterra>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Cc: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
In-Reply-To: <199507072342.AA084580537@ooo.lanl.gov> (message from Rob Hartill
 on Fri, 7 Jul 95 17:42:17 MDT)
Subject: Re: is 5.2 okay ?
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

   From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
   Date: Fri, 7 Jul 95 17:42:17 MDT
   Precedence: bulk
   Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com


   I just compiled 5.2 and plugged it in, but it's not working..

   It's failing to respond, error messages end up in the window
   I start the server from.

Bleah!  I may be able to wangle access to an HP-UX system to try to
figure this out over the weekend...

   Looks the same with 5.1.   Works okay with apache 0.7, so it can't be
   a config problem

And I'm not aware of any significant changes to http_main.c or
http_request.c between 0.4 and 0.5 which would account for something
like this.  (The only thing that changed seriously in http_main.c
from, say, 0.3 through 0.5.1 was adding the locking stuff, which
should be compiled in on HP-UX anyway). 

   compile flags..

	   c89 -Wall -DHPUX  -o httpd alloc.o http_main.o http_core.o http_config.o http_request.o  http_log.o http_protocol.o util.o util_script.o modules.o mod_mime.o mod_access.o mod_alias.o mod_cgi.o mod_include.o  mod_dir.o mod_auth.o mod_auth_dbm.o mod_negotiation.o mod_userdir.o  mod_common_log.o -lndbm

rst