Return-Path: owner-new-httpd Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id RAA09502; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 17:10:47 -0700 Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) with ESMTP id RAA09496; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 17:10:44 -0700 Received: from zyzzyva.com (randy@localhost.zyzzyva.com [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id TAA15075 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 19:10:40 -0500 Message-Id: <199506090010.TAA15075@sierra.zyzzyva.com> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: access_count (fwd) In-reply-to: brian's message of Thu, 08 Jun 1995 10:57:11 -0700. X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 19:10:35 -0500 From: Randy Terbush Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org > > Here's mail from the guy who wrote access_count which is used on the > Apache pages, and we had talked about embedding into Apache as a new CGI > variable/SSI option. I like the idea, but I'm thinking now I'd rather > have the access times stored as a DBM file instead of flat file so it > could scalably be used across the board, and to put it in apache it'd > have to be rewritten anyways. What do thers think? My 2 cents on this is that I would prefer to rework this. It is not high priority in my mind, and there are tons of other solutions.