httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Hartill <hart...@ooo.lanl.gov>
Subject Re: More on logging
Date Thu, 08 Jun 1995 15:03:58 GMT

> > Yup, all children drop the info down a socket to the logging process :-)
> 
> Well, this is the part of the design of this that we seem to be
> most stuck on.
> 
> Can this socket you suggest exist between every child to the
> existing parent?  

yes.

> I dislike the idea of having yet another
> rather sophisticated program that each child is talking to.

unlike shared mem, this continue to work if the parent is ousted from
the job of being the logging process, in favor of an external logger.

> IF we setup a socket between the child and parent for logging
> transactions, does it need to be bidirectional?

no, but there's no reason why it couldn't, if the parent had some info
the children wanted.


--
Rob Hartill                           
http://nqcd.lanl.gov/~hartill/

Mime
View raw message