Return-Path: owner-new-httpd
Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id OAA13746;
 Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:57:22 -0700
Received: from ooo.lanl.gov by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) with ESMTP id
 OAA13741; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:57:20 -0700
Received: by ooo.lanl.gov
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA283114999; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 15:56:39 -0600
From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <199504202156.AA283114999@ooo.lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: ready ?
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 95 15:56:39 MDT
In-Reply-To: <9504202147.AA03746@volterra>;
 from "Robert S. Thau" at Apr 20, 95 5:47 pm
Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory
Address: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663,
 Los Alamos NM 87545
Fax: (505) 667 5585
Phone: (505) 665-2280 or 667-5336 (T-8 Secretary)
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: owner-new-httpd@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

> 
> One random caution --- I've got a report from someone running 0.6.1
> (he just *found* it on hyperreal), that XBITHACK doesn't work.  I suspect
> something flaky may be going on, but I don't know yet whether it's site
> setup or a real problem with the server.  If XBITHACK is working for other
> people, then I'm still +1 on a beta release; just as a sanity check, I'd
> be reassured if I knew someone had checked.

Sounds like he set it up wrong. Works fine, and moreover it isn't
something that is likely to have slipped by so many of us for this long.
Many of us use it heavily.