Return-Path: owner-new-httpd
Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id IAA07748;
 Wed, 12 Apr 1995 08:50:28 -0700
Received: from ooo.lanl.gov by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) with ESMTP id
 IAA07734; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 08:50:24 -0700
Received: by ooo.lanl.gov
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA269031816; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 09:50:16 -0600
From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <199504121550.AA269031816@ooo.lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: Copyrights
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 95 9:50:16 MDT
In-Reply-To: <199504120420.FAA08374@isl.cf.ac.uk>;
 from "Paul Richards" at Apr 12, 95 5:20 am
Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory
Address: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663,
 Los Alamos NM 87545
Fax: (505) 667 5585
Phone: (505) 665-2280 or 667-5336 (T-8 Secretary)
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: owner-new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

 
> That's not the issue. Neither FreeBSD nor WC will touch source
> files without Copyrights on them period which is why I raised this

We have a (c) in the license, and the license says it covers all the
source. We'll have reference to the license from the source too.

> Incidentally, you can't refer to the Apache group in the license.

What'd you mean we "can't" - we already have  :-)

> There's no such thing unless you set up something like a non-for-profit
> Apache Inc.  which is what XFree86 did and what FreeBSD is in the
> process of doing.

So how do we make "Apache Group" official ?



robh