Return-Path: owner-new-httpd Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id HAA27706; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 07:56:53 -0700 Received: from ooo.lanl.gov by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) with ESMTP id HAA27699; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 07:56:51 -0700 Received: by ooo.lanl.gov (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA009867406; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 08:56:46 -0600 From: Rob Hartill Message-Id: <199504041456.AA009867406@ooo.lanl.gov> Subject: Re: Logging of remote_user To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Tue, 4 Apr 95 8:56:46 MDT In-Reply-To: ; from "David Robinson" at Apr 4, 95 3:47 pm Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory Address: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663, Los Alamos NM 87545 Fax: (505) 667 5585 Phone: (505) 665-2280 or 667-5336 (T-8 Secretary) Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-new-httpd@hyperreal.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > > Currently httpd only logs any username for protected documents. How do folks > feel about my changing this so that it logs any remote username sent by the > client (as part of authentication data), even if the document being > accessed was not protected? > > I've found another bug in the handling of the user information, and it might > be convenient to change the logging in the manner I described. Can this be addressed with other custom logging related things. If we can add custom logging, this sort of thing will just fall out if it. I'm not interested in user names in my logfile, so a single patch to add that wouldn't be of use to many people. rob