Return-Path: owner-new-httpd
Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id PAA00882;
 Tue, 21 Mar 1995 15:31:04 -0800
Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) with SMTP
 id PAA00870; Tue, 21 Mar 1995 15:31:01 -0800
Received: from volterra (volterra.ai.mit.edu) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10)
 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA27326; Tue, 21 Mar 95 18:31:01 EST
From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau)
Received: by volterra (4.1/AI-4.10) id AA08099; Tue, 21 Mar 95 18:30:57 EST
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 95 18:30:57 EST
Message-Id: <9503212330.AA08099@volterra>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Cc: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
In-Reply-To: <199503212119.PAA10848@fiction.isdn.uiuc.edu> (message from
 Brandon Long on Tue, 21 Mar 1995 15:19:18 -0600 (CST))
Subject: Re: The future, for Apache and NCSA httpd
Sender: owner-new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

   Date: Tue, 21 Mar 1995 15:19:18 -0600 (CST)
   From: Brandon Long <blong@uiuc.edu>

Brandon, thanks much for the info.

   As to what the new license will be, I'm not sure, but it probably will
   be something with the goal of keeping people from making money off of
   our code (without us getting something).  The code will be copyright
   NCSA, and if you use it, you have to say so, or something like that.

Hmmm... you did say earlier that you were fighting to avoid licensing
changes before 2.0, but it's still not clear exactly what this refers
to.  Would this "new license" apply to 1.4, subsequent 1.x releases,
or only to the 2.x series?

   At least, that's my interpretation of things.  And, I hope none of this
   information is sensitive in any way.

Thanks again.  Hope it doesn't cause you trouble.

rst