Return-Path: owner-new-httpd Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id KAA07615; Sat, 18 Mar 1995 10:43:10 -0800 Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) with SMTP id KAA07610; Sat, 18 Mar 1995 10:43:08 -0800 Received: from volterra (volterra.ai.mit.edu) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA22396; Sat, 18 Mar 95 13:43:02 EST From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau) Received: by volterra (4.1/AI-4.10) id AA05538; Sat, 18 Mar 95 13:43:01 EST Date: Sat, 18 Mar 95 13:43:01 EST Message-Id: <9503181843.AA05538@volterra> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Cc: new-httpd@hyperreal.com In-Reply-To: <9503180000.aa19988@paris.ics.uci.edu> (fielding@avron.ics.uci.edu) Subject: Re: patch list vote Sender: owner-new-httpd@hyperreal.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Sat, 18 Mar 1995 00:00:38 -0800 From: "Roy T. Fielding" -1 B27 Submitter : rst@ai.mit.edu/ FAILED Status : Priority : 4 patch B23) doesn't work with XBITHACK Ouch. Sorry. I remade this patch against a version of the sources closer to the base, and uploaded the new version to hyperreal. Please try again. I'm a bit worried about builds containing B23 but not B27 --- they'll work find for anyone who doesn't use XBITHACK (I tested that out pretty thoroughly before submitting B23), but people who do use XBITHACK will find that ExecCGI from STD_DOCUMENT directories has suddenly stopped working. B27 is the (very simple) fix for this problem; if we aren't going to include it, B23 should probably be left out of the build as well. (NB I favor and voted for both, but there seem to be others, including Roy, who voted for one and not the other --- IMHO, not a good idea). rst