Return-Path: owner-new-httpd Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id PAA08019; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 15:35:22 -0800 Received: from life.ai.mit.edu by taz.hyperreal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA08012; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 15:35:18 -0800 Received: from volterra (volterra.ai.mit.edu) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for new-httpd@hyperreal.com id AA06064; Tue, 14 Mar 95 18:35:17 EST From: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau) Received: by volterra (4.1/AI-4.10) id AA03465; Tue, 14 Mar 95 18:35:09 EST Date: Tue, 14 Mar 95 18:35:09 EST Message-Id: <9503142335.AA03465@volterra> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Cc: new-httpd@hyperreal.com In-Reply-To: (message from Brian Behlendorf on Tue, 14 Mar 1995 15:21:42 -0800 (PST)) Subject: Re: httpd patch B5 updated. Sender: owner-new-httpd@hyperreal.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1995 15:21:42 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Behlendorf E16 Allow any URL to invoke a script Rob (Hartill), is this your *.doit patches? Is there a conflict between this and content negotiation? I don't see any code... No, it's *my* *.doit patches, and there is very definitely a conflict between that and content negotiation. In fact, the effect of these patches is achieved by MultiViews requests which find *.cgi scripts, so if content negotiation is in, than this is redundant. B19 Embedded blanks in headers don't work Rob (Thau), did you put this into apache-pre? This has my name on it because I noted the bug report on Lusenet, and made the bug entry, but I've never seen code to fix it. Doesn't seem hard, though. rst