From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
Message-Id: <9503142210.AA26692@ooo.lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: httpd patch B5 updated.
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 95 15:10:45 MST
In-Reply-To: <9503142149.AA19259@www.elsevier.co.uk>;
 from "Andrew Wilson" at Mar 14, 95 9:49 pm
Organization: Theoretical Division, T-8. Los Alamos National Laboratory
Address: LANL Theoretical Divi' T-8, MS B285, P.O Box 1663,
 Los Alamos NM 87545
Fax: (505) 667 5585
Phone: (505) 665-2280 or 667-5336 (T-8 Secretary)
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: owner-new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

> 
> Just what the fsck is going on anyway?

it is getting messy. I still think we should all implemement one
patch at a time together. At the rate (and hours) some are working
we can probably manage a couple of patches a day. It's far too
easy to grab the next apache-pre and without knowing what's in it
or how it is supposed to work.

If this is acceptable to the rest of the group, I think we should
order the patches, and start a systematic processes of dicsussion,
implemenations and testing.

Why not stop adding new patches for now, and just properly process 
the ones we have. Then accept more patches.


rob