httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From s.@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1000144 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Date Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:04:49 GMT
Author: sf
Date: Wed Sep 22 19:04:48 2010
New Revision: 1000144

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1000144&view=rev
Log:
- add blocker for GA: review example config
- remove old votes:
  * "what to do if parent dies" went nowhere after many years
  * we now have event MPM as default

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS?rev=1000144&r1=1000143&r2=1000144&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Wed Sep 22 19:04:48 2010
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
     - MPM simple
     - mod_serf
 
+  * Review the example configuration. It should be based on current best
+    practices and not use deprecated features.
+
   FOR BETA:
 
   * Modules without documentation need to be moved to experimental or be
@@ -103,31 +106,6 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
 
 CURRENT VOTES:
 
-  * If the parent process dies, should the remaining child processes
-    "gracefully" self-terminate. Or maybe we should make it a runtime
-    option, or have a concept of 2 parent processes (one being a 
-    "hot spare").
-    See: Message-ID: <3C58232C.FE91F19F@Golux.Com>
-
-    Self-destruct: Ken, Martin, Lars, sctemme (parent shouldn't die, ever)
-    Not self-destruct: BrianP, Ian, Cliff, BillS
-    Make it runtime configurable: Aaron, jim, Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd, pgollucci
-
-    /* The below was a concept on *how* to handle the problem */
-    Have 2 parents: +1: jim
-                    -1: Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd, pgollucci
-                    +0: Lars, Martin (while standing by, could it do
-                                      something useful?)
-
-  * Make the worker MPM the default MPM for threaded Unix boxes.
-    +1:   Justin, Ian, Cliff, BillS, striker, wrowe, nd, pgollucci, sctemme
-    +0:   BrianP, Aaron (mutex contention is looking better with the
-          latest code, let's continue tuning and testing), rederpj, jim
-    -0:   Lars
-
-    pquerna: Do we want to change this for *2.4*?
-    wrowe: Replies "yes"
-
   * Name the Server (version 2.4 or 3.0, depending on the final call)
     Recent discussion indicates we should designate a (short name).
     This is not yet a [Vote] - Your nominations please:



Mime
View raw message