httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From wr...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r607938 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Date Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:54:22 GMT
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Jan  1 14:54:21 2008
New Revision: 607938

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607938&view=rev
Log:
promoting 2.0 version patches.

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS?rev=607938&r1=607937&r2=607938&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Tue Jan  1 14:54:21 2008
@@ -129,7 +129,8 @@
        http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607282&view=rev
     Backport version for 2.0.x of patch:
        http://awe.com/e8f6ad05238f8/CVE-2007-6388-httpd-2.x.patch
-    +1: rpluem, fuankg
+    +1: rpluem, fuankg, wrowe
+    wrowe is +1 for having that default to a value of 10 instead of 1 @ln# 307
 
 PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@
     nobody can actually remember why this limitation was introduced at all 
     (r94028) and the mailing list archives also gave no hint.
       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=327179
-    +0: covener
+    +0: covener, wrowe
           do we need to make people opt-in for this behavior to 
           backport it to 2.0.x? What mechanism?
 
@@ -163,7 +164,7 @@
        http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=164538
     Backport version for 2.0.x of patch:
        http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.0.x-ap_vhost_iterate_given_conn.diff
-    +1: fuankg
+    +1: fuankg, wrowe
 
 PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON:
 



Mime
View raw message