Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-cvs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66469 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2007 15:20:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2007 15:20:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 97211 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2007 15:19:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-cvs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97151 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2007 15:19:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list cvs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97140 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2007 15:19:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 07:19:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO eris.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:19:54 +0000 Received: by eris.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id C36081A9832; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 07:19:43 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: svn commit: r595963 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc: perf-tuning.html.en perf-tuning.xml Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:19:41 -0000 To: cvs@httpd.apache.org From: noodl@apache.org X-Mailer: svnmailer-1.0.8 Message-Id: <20071117151943.C36081A9832@eris.apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Author: noodl Date: Sat Nov 17 07:19:41 2007 New Revision: 595963 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595963&view=rev Log: 'youare' typo (submitted by Luciene Gentis) Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.html.en httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.xml Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.html.en URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.html.en?rev=595963&r1=595962&r2=595963&view=diff ============================================================================== --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.html.en (original) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.html.en Sat Nov 17 07:19:41 2007 @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@

Since memory usage is such an important consideration in - performance, you should attempt to eliminate modules that youare + performance, you should attempt to eliminate modules that you are not actually using. If you have built the modules as DSOs, eliminating modules is a simple matter of commenting out the associated LoadModule directive for that module. This allows you to experiment with removing modules, and seeing Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.xml?rev=595963&r1=595962&r2=595963&view=diff ============================================================================== --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.xml (original) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/misc/perf-tuning.xml Sat Nov 17 07:19:41 2007 @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ Modules

Since memory usage is such an important consideration in - performance, you should attempt to eliminate modules that youare + performance, you should attempt to eliminate modules that you are not actually using. If you have built the modules as DSOs, eliminating modules is a simple matter of commenting out the associated