httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From j..@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r572791 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Date Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:38:38 GMT
Author: jim
Date: Tue Sep  4 12:38:37 2007
New Revision: 572791

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572791&view=rev
Log:
Cast a vote, and demote one proposal (but it can always
be un-demoted :) )

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS?rev=572791&r1=572790&r2=572791&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Tue Sep  4 12:38:37 2007
@@ -122,18 +122,12 @@
     identify exactly what the proposed changes are!  Add all new
     proposals to the end of this list. ]
 
-    *) Reverse Proxy fixes: <Location> bug and Cookie support
-        Patch is at
-        http://people.apache.org/~colm/httpd-2.0-reverse-proxy-cookie.patch
-        and is in production with Clients.
-       +1: niq, wrowe
-         wrowe adds; looks good, no way to apply this without a minor bump
-
     *) Backport 102870; PR 17217; stop linking OpenSSL .so's to support/*
        binaries (especially when compiled --with-static-support (!)) and
        fix mod_ssl.so to compile against .a openssl archives.
          http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=102870&view=rev
        +1: wrowe, colm
+       -1: jim (does not cleanly backport)
 
 
 PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON:
@@ -290,6 +284,13 @@
              looking at the headers.  For that matter, why are subreq's even
              propogating POST or other non-GET types?  It seems that almost
              any subreq should be handled as a GET in 2.0.
+
+    *) Reverse Proxy fixes: <Location> bug and Cookie support
+        Patch is at
+        http://people.apache.org/~colm/httpd-2.0-reverse-proxy-cookie.patch
+        and is in production with Clients.
+       +1: niq, wrowe
+         wrowe adds; looks good, no way to apply this without a minor bump
 
 CURRENT VOTES:
 



Mime
View raw message