Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.146.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=bYwUWCp6EnJ2K89Boqp4yI90vd/fVyCECtOcSiU79FeWiiLiQVKHrcmQbZ+bt5EOngLEj53AQv13l0TBwaOTMin0tElaKcW9WgZIOAlXmuGzZdB2jw/b86XTHnEigcSxCXNJzJl59ARKvjG9JEd3+4HBN6NRVX/fAW2ZP4eQ8Hg=
Message-ID: <5c902b9e0708061128p503b7716k100fb186d3f04725@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:28:12 -0700
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <justin@erenkrantz.com>
Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org, jim@jagunet.com
Subject: Re: svn commit: r563196 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Cc: cvs@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <200708061728.l76HSNK3034568@devsys.jaguNET.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070806171121.4A6AB1A981A@eris.apache.org>
	 <200708061728.l76HSNK3034568@devsys.jaguNET.com>

On 8/6/07, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Ummm... These didn't have 3 +1 votes.
>
> So why were they applied and committed??

I think for platform-specific code we've been okay with a smaller
consensus than 3.

If our only two NetWare guys agree on the change, then I doubt the
rest of us have anything to add to the conversation.  And until
recently, we only had one NetWare-savvy committer; so we're making
progress towards getting 3.  =P  -- justin