httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r390599 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:55:50 GMT wrote:
> Author: pquerna
> Date: Fri Mar 31 22:33:47 2006
> New Revision: 390599
> URL:
> Log:
> I am not comfortable with this solution for making the flushing band aid configurable.
I do not oppose the concept, just the placement of the configuration information inside of
the mod_proxy core, and not in mod_proxy_ajp.

The main reason why it's in mod_proxy (and the various elements
renamed from ajp_foo to foo) is that as we extend mod_proxy
for other protocols, same packet-based like AJP, this will
likely be a common problem. Even in non-packet based
protocols, I can see wanting some level of admin control.

   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [|]
	    "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

View raw message