httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From pque...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r332920 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:06:59 GMT
Author: pquerna
Date: Sat Nov 12 23:06:58 2005
New Revision: 332920

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332920&view=rev
Log:
Move the Edge Connection Filter issue to a non-showstoper, as I mentioned on the mailing list
last week.

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=332920&r1=332919&r2=332920&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Sat Nov 12 23:06:58 2005
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 The current version of this file can be found at:
 
-  * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
+  * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
 
 Documentation status is maintained seperately and can be found at:
 
@@ -71,18 +71,6 @@
         showstopper.
       pquerna agrees: Not a regression from 2.0.x.
 
-    * the edge connection filter cannot be removed 
-      http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=105366252619530&w=2
-
-      jerenkrantz asks: Why should this block a release?
-
-      stas replies: because it requires a rewrite of the filters stack
-            implementation (you have suggested that) and once 2.2 is
-            released you can't do that anymore. 
-
-      pquerna says: Rewriting the filter stack can happen after 2.2, imo.
-                    This isn't a regression from 2.0.x.
-
 CURRENT VOTES:
 
     * httpd-std.conf and friends
@@ -139,6 +127,18 @@
 
 
 RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:
+
+    * the edge connection filter cannot be removed 
+      http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=105366252619530&w=2
+
+      jerenkrantz asks: Why should this block a release?
+
+      stas replies: because it requires a rewrite of the filters stack
+            implementation (you have suggested that) and once 2.2 is
+            released you can't do that anymore. 
+
+      pquerna says: Rewriting the filter stack can happen after 2.2, imo.
+                    This isn't a regression from 2.0.x.
 
     * mod_cache currently trumps mod_authz_host. When serving local content,
       the directives: "Allow from 10.0.0.0/8\nDeny from all" become



Mime
View raw message