httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From traw...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r153092 - httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml
Date Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:35:09 GMT
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Feb  9 09:35:05 2005
New Revision: 153092

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=153092
Log:
fix function name in developer doc

PR: 33438
Submitted by: Bojan Smojver
Reviewed by: Jeff Trawick

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en
    httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml

Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en?view=diff&r1=153091&r2=153092
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en Wed Feb  9 09:35:05 2005
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
     behavior. As patches were introduced to 2.0, these
     optimizations (and the server behavior) were quickly broken due
     to this duplication of code. All duplicate code has been folded
-    back into <code>ap_process_internal_request()</code> to prevent
+    back into <code>ap_process_request_internal()</code> to prevent
     the code from falling out of sync again.</p>
 
     <p>This means that much of the existing code was 'unoptimized'.

Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml?view=diff&r1=153091&r2=153092
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml Wed Feb  9 09:35:05 2005
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
     behavior. As patches were introduced to 2.0, these
     optimizations (and the server behavior) were quickly broken due
     to this duplication of code. All duplicate code has been folded
-    back into <code>ap_process_internal_request()</code> to prevent
+    back into <code>ap_process_request_internal()</code> to prevent
     the code from falling out of sync again.</p>
 
     <p>This means that much of the existing code was 'unoptimized'.



Mime
View raw message